Interview
Transcripts:
Jim Prezwalski (part 2)
RAR--Let's
get back to piercing for a moment. Do some people in the club have difficulty
finding someone with expertise in this area to do certain kinds of body
piercings since some do require a certain amount of knowledge and experience?
JP--TLC
is lucky in that there is at least one person in the club who has done
piercings and does do piercings and has good technique. Well, for people
who aren't aware, for men probably the most common piercing is to have
either the right or the left nipple pierced. Women will usually get their
nipples pierced also. The next most common piercing for men is what they
call a "Prince Albert" which is sort of...it's called a "dressing ring"
and supposedly Queen Victoria's consort, Prince Albert, had a Prince Albert
which is through the urethra into the head of the penis.
The
importance of piercing, especially in the AIDS era, is to make sure that
sterile technique is being followed--that somebody uses new needles, that
sterilization has occured, that they know what they're doing because erectal(?)
tissue, which is what the nipples, the penis, and the vaginal area are
basically made out of, is very tough tissue. It's surprising to people
that they expect a piercing through those areas to be like skin or they
tend to think of those areas as being, since they're sensitive, they must
be thin tissue--no, they're sensitive because they have alot of nerves
in them, but they're actually very tough tissues.
It's
very important to find somebody that not only has good sterile technique,
but also has the experience of being to deal with the different configurations
of individual anatomy and also scar tissue that a person may not even
be aware that they have. When I had a piercing done, I had a physician
doing during a scene. Well, the complication arose in that when I was
circumcised, I had scar tissue that built up without anybody being able
to detect it and he tried twice and his philosophy was he would go so
far and that was it. I eventually found somebody who had much more experience
and even that person, somebody out of Chicago who has done hundreds of
piercings, had to try twice also. He finally got it on the second try
and I remember thinking to myself that I would never go through this again.
RAR--What
are some of the different kinds of piercings that people get?
JP--I
put piercing down into two major categories. Piercings are erotic-erotic
enhancements. Piercings can be erotic enhancements because you'e piercing
the tissue, you're in essence you're increasing the surface area, you're
disrupting where nerves flow directly to. You're also putting in a device
that now is adding additional friction to the individual members, be they
in the vulva, in the penis, in the scrotum, in the nipples. The other
category would be strictly for visual effect. I don't find a nose piercing
erotic--I find it intriguing in certain people, I find it interesting;
but, for me to have it done would not be an erotic inducement. However,
having a Prince Albert or a Guiche, which is a piercing just beneath the
ball sac, is something that is erotic. The guiche is one that I found
mentally stimulating when I first had it put in; I reduced it to the category
of adornment, and now that it's been a couple of months and things have
healed up, I've moved it back into the erotic because now I can play with
it (laughs). It's a delight to be able to move back and forth between
the two. I like erotic enhancement piercings, even if they're temporary,
because of that little extra edge that it puts on. Some people says it's
more than a little extra edge.
One
of the first temporary piercings I saw was at a MAFIA party back in Detroit.
We had a wonderful man who has since died of a heart attack, who worked
at a hospital and he used to get the long spinal needles--the insides
of those he would get, they were a very thin metal gauge, and he would
resterilize those and he had B.J., who was from one of the clubs up there,
and one of the bondage implements are these inflatable casts that they
use in emergency rooms to do temporary settings until they can actually
splint them and put the plaster on and we had those on his arms and legs
and George did a temporary piercing of his nipples. And just delicately
played them and just had B.J. singing a real tune and that was his birthday
fantasy--he'd always wanted that done and he was blindfolded, so he was
never sure who was doing what at what time to him. For me, it was quite
an experience watching that being done and being taught how to do this
and how to maneuver it rather delicately as opposed to some roughshod
method. It was also interesting because the only piercings I had seen
up til then had been with rather thick gauge needles and this was something
that was thinner than a piano wire, just almost hair thin.
RAR--With
a temporary piercing, how quickly does it heal up?
JP--The
thing with piercings is that, as far as the body is concerned, it doesn't
exist. If you do a piercing and you pull the needle out, you cannot find
that hole again. The tissues just close right up, so that you need to
have somebody who knows what he's doing because if somebody fumbles and
can't get the ring to follow the needle, they have to re-do the piercing--there
is no "finding" the hole. The hole will only exist when something is in
there and then the body eventually will have cells migrate in to seal
it off--that forms a tunnel that goes through. But, a true temporary piercing
is something that technically only exists as long as that needle is in
there--pull the needle out and you re-pierce. Some people develop scar
tissue, so that after a while they can't or shouldn't be pierced any longer,
but it takes an awful lot to get to that point.
RAR--If
you took out the ring on a permanent piercing, a nipple for example, (JP
shows nipple ring) would it close up?
JP--If
I took this out, this is a 12 gauge, and if I took that out, that hole
would eventually close up the same way that a hole in the ear would eventually
close up. The general rule is, in a 12 guage piercing, after about three
days you'll need to have a stretching needle, which looks like a miniature
old darning needle or a knitting needle without the point on it in order
to get the jewelry back in because the hole will close back up. Your body
knows what holes should be there and if it's not a hole that the body
thinks ought to be there, it will close it up--that's one of the difficulties
with transexuals is that they always have to wear some kind of artificial
device in the vagina that's created because the body tries to close them
off and make them smooth like a Barbie doll.
RAR--Do
you know anything about the origin of different kinds of piercings?
JP--Oh,
I tried to look that up in the UNC (University of North Carolina) library.
Actually, ReSearch publications has probably done the best job of putting
out literature on the history of piercing. It's something that Western
culture just simply lost. We know that the Celts and the Roman soldiers
probably picked it up from them and probably from the Easterns and they
had probably done piercings, but even though I've had Roman history and
Greek history, that's not the sort of thing they cover (laughs) and trying
to track it down has been difficult. It's one of those things that anthropology
just sort of shys away from. There are some things, as in Mary Shelley's
"Frankenstein", that "man was not meant to know".
RAR--Are
their tribes in "primitive" cultures that practice piercing?
JP--There
are. There were a number of British explorers who kept wonderful notes
on tribal practices throughout Africa, throughout Asia and alot of times
when those people died, their writings were burned as being uncivilized,
as being obscene. I believe it was the man who was one of the discoverers
of Lake Victoria, who, when he died, his wife took all of his notes and
alot of these things were about religious rites and puberty rites, and
she just felt that they were an offense to God and she burned them all
and it was a tragic loss for all of us. We have had this spilling into
Western culture now colonialism has sort of backed off and it's come through
in some amazing ways. The oil boom that occurred in Urba (sp?) brought
back some of the more exotic penal piercings. The oil workers started
coming back with piercings through the head of the penis, some going all
the way through, which is a continuation, bascially, of a Prince Albert
and some going completely through the side. And those were things we hadn't
seen in Western culture before, at least within my knowledge. People like
Jim Ward at Gauntlet have done alot to sort of resurrect piercing within
Western culture and to bring it back in. Even alot of the piercings that
used to occur in Eastern Europe have vanished during this century so that
very little is left. We've purged it from our culture and we've purged
the memory of it from our records.
RAR--Do
you find that some of the trappings of Leather community are spilling
over into popular culture? How do feel about that?
JP--(laughs
intensely) What would give you that idea? (smiles) Somebody asked me what
I thought of Madonna's book "Sex" and I remember running into Madonna
a couple of times in Ann Arbor when she was an unknown and I have to admit
that her ego even then was warranted. She was a very savvy entrepreneur
and that's what her book "Sex" is--it's not about sado-masochism, it's
not about Leather, it's about making money. Marilyn Monroe has just about
run it's course and now she's going into pushing the edges on this image
and when Madonna hits my age, I'm interested in seeing what direction
she'll be going. Maybe she'll be pusing Mary Kay cosmetics in another
book.
The
trappings, by that I would take it to indicate fashion more than anything
else and, yeah, that's always gonna happen. But that's something that
comes and goes. People who wear the leather jacket, wear the accoutremonts
that's something that, "Well, it's time to go to work", it all comes off
and away you go. I think the people who get the piercings and get the
tattoos, by and large, have another motive other than just simply fashion.
Yes, you there are people who will get the fashion; you'll see the little
diamond stud in their (indicating the ear), but you're not going to see,
by and large, the fashion .... clip a pony-tail on the back of his hair
when he goes out to dance at the disco in New York is not the same person
that's going to get a piercing done, is not the same person that's going
to do some kind of body modification, is going to get a ritual scarring,
that is going to, in a sexual scene where he's going to build up to some
sort of event, be it an activity or a rite of passage of some sort. I
do see people experimenting more and more. The trappings will certainly
allow people who were firmly in the closet as I was to take that first
step out, to find out that "Ohhh, nobody's throwing rocks at me, I can
go a little further" and "I like this, I like the way that smells" and
to start to meet other people who are like-minded. There's something about
finally realizing that you're part of a group that gives you more courage
to go ahead. That you'll eventually take those steps that were impossible
for you to take as an individual because you didn't have any sense of
a group.
RAR--Let's
talk about the signals that Leather people use in becoming part of a group,
for example hanky codes.
JP--Basically,
the Leather/SM community is a subversive community which is why both the
religious groups and alot of the political groups put so much focus on
us. We are not only highly visible, but we're basically subversive. We
do things differently; we think for ourselves and like any subversive
group, we have to have ways of sort of signalling what you want to do.
In some cases you can't take the risk of being open like here in North
Carolina I would be very careful about approaching somebody I had never
seen before and there are ways of indicating what your preferences are,
whether you top or whether you bottom.
Part
of that is dividing things down the middle, left and right--usually anything
on the left-hand side, whether it's a nipple ring, whether it's your keys
being worn on one side or the other or a hanky tucked in a left or right
hand pocket, will indicate whether you are a top or a bottom. Then it
gets even more complicated. The hanky codes are being continually updated.
The type of hanky one flies can indicate different things so if one wears
a blue hanky that means that one likes to have oral intercourse and if
you wear it on the left side, that means you want to be the pentrator,
if you wear it on the right side it means you're looking to throw your
feet to Jesus. If somebody has a black hanky that means they're into whipping
or flogging and, again, left side means that's the flogger or the whipper,
right side means that's the whippee. But, it's not always clear because
black also stands for heavy duty, that you're a heavy top or that you're
a heavy bottom. So, there's always some ambiguity.
And
some of the hanky colors are very hard to tell apart--I happen to be color
blind, so that when we get into some of these more exotic colors like
robin's egg blue or lavender or magenta or kelly green or brown, I can't
tell them apart and when most people are in bars, the bars have either
a blueish light or red light and the lights are dim. How anybody can be
sure without taking along a little flashlight to double-check is beyond
me.
Hankies,
keys, piercings, these are all ways to sort of indicate a generality and
things are always open to negotiation. The thing that I love about the
Leather/SM community is the communication that has to occur--you just
don't have anonymous sex, you really have to talk with the person, you
have to negotiate, you have to get to know the person and develop a raport,
a relationship and a trust in order to connect, in order to fulfill each
other. And I think it's a much deeper process than I've seen in alot of
the relationships, straight or gay.
RAR--Could
you explain Safe/Sane/Consensual?
JP--Back
in the late 70's and early 80's, there was alot of criticism of SM. In
fact, I think it was in '80 or '81, there was a Lesbian manefesto against
SM, a radical feminist analysis and the basic premise of it was that SM
was a domination, a total domination--in essence, they were interpreting
it only in terms of DeSade's writings, that you were enslaving somebody
and they argued against consentual, they said that SM really isn't consentual
because somebody could be in a subordinate position and give that consent
reluctantly or give that consent and it turns into slavery, which was
a bit unfair on their part.
Alot
of the thinking that went into the phrase "Safe, Sane, and Consensual"
was really in response to that sort of feminist attack on what SM was.
They tended to view SM only as, if it's only women doing SM, only women
beating women, who does that profit? I mean, that was the level of thinking,
but they did come up with some valid points and I think the Leather community,
both the male and the women's community, have done a good job in sort
of building on that and learning from that severe attack from within the
Gay and Lesbian community. Safe has more than just the connotation of
being careful in this era of AIDS, it's also on knowing how far you can
push somebody, it's knowing anatomy so that if somebody's doing fisting,
which is the insertion of the hand into the rectum and doing manipulation
that way, that you know the anatomy down there, that you know how to do
it safely without damaging a person. But safety also indicates that, in
this era of AIDS, that you use only lubrication for that person, that
it's used on nobody else, that you put a glove on to protect both of you
and to cut down on the possibility of transmission.
Consensual
means just that--that two people, three people, a house full of people,
talk and mutually agree on what it is they're going to do, that they have
an idea of compatibility, that they have an idea of where they're going
to go in this relationship. Maybe the ultimate goal of the evening is
orgasm, sometimes it's not. Sometimes somebody just wants to be dominated
and alot of times, somebody who is a manager and gives orders all week,
simply wants to give up control for the evening and to him that's as satisfying
as reaching an orgasm.
Sane,
of course, is trying to keep it within the bounds of reason. They're still
debates occurring trying to define what Sane is. Human beings, I don't
think, being basically insane creatures, will ever define what sanity
is. (laughs) To most of the straights, in fact to most of the Gay and
Lesbian community, which really doesn't have an understanding of what
SM is about, much of what we do is insane. But, when somebody starts to
actually get to know about things, there were activities that, when I
first came out to Leather, I never thought that I would be participating
in that I thought were insane and now I've seen what people are trying
to get out of it and how their thought processes (work) and sometimes
it's not. Sometimes it's a compulsion and you have no idea where those
are coming from.
RAR--What
are some of the other organizations that you have been involved with?
JP--TLC's
actually the first club that I joined. The man who brought me out to Leather
lived in Chicago and introduced me to a number of different organizations--that's
how I first met some of the people in Hellfire, that's how I first met
some of the people in dicussion groups in Chicago, and I wound up meeting
somebody in Detroit who brought me to my first MAFIA party; MAFIA stands
for Mid-America Fists in Action and it's a fisting group. I had been associated
with them for four years before I joined them and I actually joined them
after I joined TLC. I saw no reason for joining the organization if I
was always being invited to the parties (laughs).
There
are different levels of what Leather/SM organizations, clubs really do
and what they are. MAFIA and a number of other specialty clubs are social
organizations; they're a way for people to get together and have parties
together and get together with like-minded individuals. There are other
organizations, like Chicago Leather United, which is simply a Leather-fetish
club, which is actually sort of overstating it or understating it because
at some of the meetings, I've seen people show up in kilts--it's a uniform
fetish, too. They don't have play parties and, as near as I can tell,
it's mostly just a social and sometimes they do political work and (fundraising
for) health issues and causes. Then there are groups that are basically
educational--GMSMA is one of those groups, Hellfire, of course, is probably
one of the biggest promoters with their Inferno and then there are groups
that are political and, again, some of the bigger clubs are that way.
Most
clubs wind up getting politically involved at one time or another. TLC
just kind of seemed to have started off political from the start and it's
done what alot of good, basic clubs do--it tries to tend to all the needs
of its members--it's a good club for being politically active, socially
active; it tries to bring awareness to the community. I remember Reverand
Zallman (sp?) Sherwood, who used to be a minister down here and wrote
a book about his experiences coming out as a Gay priest in the Episcopal
church, making the statement that the only way we're going to change the
church is for people to show up with their lovers and sit side-by-side
as a couple with all of the other couples at the Sunday church dinner
and it's gratifying to see that type of information being taken to heart
by a number of TLC members who go to MCC in full leather and have gotten
the congregation used to the idea that Leatherpeople are like everybody
else--okay, they dress a little different, their practices are a little
different, but they're not going to kidnap us and tie us up--unless we
want them to. It's that sort of all around involvement and an attention
to educating new members and to keeping issues alive that would otherwise
be swept under the carpet or things that would be uncomfortable for the
rest of the Gay and Lesbian community to deal with and to also try and
reach out to some of the straight members of the community, that we have
all of these resources at our disposal now and really straights have very
little and they have to look to the Gay and Lesbian communities in order
to get that and we're providing that for them. The more that we can show
people that we're not, as the Fundamentalists would paint us, these evil
beings that hatched from eggs from hell, but your uncles, your fathers,
your mothers, your aunts--it's in the club.
RAR--Speaking
in general about Leather clubs now, do you find rifts between the older
members coming from the older-style, close-knit sex clubs and the newer
clubs which are more educational and political in nature?
JP--For
those of us who had come out pre-AIDS, it's been a real change and, by
and large, that's the same group that's dealing with getting older. I
had dinner with a friend of mine and he was talking about answering personals,
things out of "Drummer" magazine, and going through every ad that didn't
mention that they were looking for somebody 18-35. That particular friend
happens to be in his sixties--very knowledgeable, very wonderful, warm,
caring man, financially stable, and I kind of took him to task for going
after younger people and wondering that he was taken advantage of by some
of these and his comment was, just simply, "You wait another twenty years,
and when you're my age you just see how discriminating you can be." That's
something that is a generational gap and I think what we're seeing in
the Leather Community, in some ways, that gap, that breaking apart and
age has alot to do with it and some of it is the experiences.
There's
also the tendancy in the human species to be elitist anyways. People always
say that courtesy is to sort of "grease the social wheels" and that was
one thing that I remember, having to read a two volume German book on
for a class I had, and courtesy as we know it actually involved when the
middle class was rising and the nobility wanted to reinforce the idea
that they were better than the rest and so they started all of these elaborate
social rituals. Like, instead of grabbing into a common bowl when eating,
they started using utensils, rather than blowing their nose on the ground
or in their sleeve, they started using bits of cloth and gradually the
rising middle class adopted those and so the nobility had to invent new
techniques--we see the same thing in the Leather community. You've got
the old guard in there, they've made their reputations, they're giving
the demonstrations, and you've got the people who are new to it. I've
seen some demonstrations that are nothing more than pontifications and,
if you're going to show somebody how to do something, fine, but leave
the stuff from the "Propagation of Faith" (sp?) behind, because that's
just serving to say "I'm more knowledgeable than you are."
But,
every club I see, it isn't just one club from another, but every club,
every organization, goes through this generational conflict every so often.
It eventually resolves itself--the new eventually takes over, but, if
they'e smart, they'll listen and talk to the old guard. I'm one of those
people that's a hybrid--I learned from both what's been considered New
Leather and Old Leather and I have respect for both. I have very little
tolerance for somebody who pretends to know about SM or about Leather
when it's clear all that they have done is adopt the trappings, that the
glitter is there--they have the facade all set, but it's like a Hollywood
set, once you get behind, you suddenly realize it's all props or you wind
up with, sort of like "The Wizard of Oz": "Ignore the man behind the curtain."
RAR--What
is a pledge?
JP--Pledging
is a good way to show the difference between the New and the Old. When
I was coming out to Leather, I was lucky enough to find somebody who told
me I was going to learn how to top and these days, I think most people
start off bottoming and then learning how to top. What I learned first
was how to top, then bottom, and now I can go both ways. The Old Guard
pretty much, if you read books like "Leatherfolk", people will talk about
in the fifties and sixties, how bottoms abounded or was it the other way
around--I forget. At any rate, the Old Guard used to talk about how you
first had to train as a top, when you were good enough, then you were
allowed to become a bottom. These days, it seems that joke always is,
in the bar--Donovan (sp?) drew a wonderful cartoon, which is the bartender
going, "Okay, we want all the bottoms over there and, come on, there's
got to be some tops here." That was one of the reasons that David wanted
me to learn how to be a top, was that I would know how to do things correctly,
safely, but also that there was somebody to sort of carry on some of the
knowledge that people had and that I could also do a better job of spotting
what was an unsafe situation before I got too deeply involved, that if
you know the way something is supposed to be done, you're a better judge
of whether that person is really going to be able to treat you safely
and whether that person is indeed sane. There's alot of people who violate
that by pretending to know more or do more than they can.
RAR--First
off, what is a pledge?
JP--Somebody
who wants to join the club. Pledging serves a number of purposes. The
pledging process allows somebody to participate and to mingle with the
club members on a social basis and also on a one-to-one basis, depending
on the particular pledge structure that's set up, so that people have
an idea of this person's personality, this person's psychology, the person's
social skills. That's how you can weed out the weirder aspects. The other
thing is that the pledging process is an opportunity for the pledge to
learn about the club, to learn about the individual members, so that he
or she can make the decision whether that is an appropriate club for them
to join because not every club is going to mesh with the person's personality
or desires and where they want to go with their Leather or SM fetish.
The other thing is that it gives the person an opportunity to learn about
Leather, to learn about SM so that if they've always wondered about what
it's like to surrender, to be tied up, to be immobile, they have the chance
to connect with somebody to experience that or, through educational programs,
learn what different things are. For alot of people, this is the first
time and only time that they will get to see a number of things, something
like piercing, urethral manipulation, catherization--unless you work in
a hospital. It really is a two-way process--the club members learn from
the pledge and the pledge learns from the club. It's also a way of passing
on traditions, of incorporating new ideas, and one always needs sort of
a fresh influx.
RAR--Do
you find that people bring their real-life work skills or hobby talents
to contribute to the club's work?
JP--I
suppose that people can, with their diverse backgrounds, business backgrounds
and professional skills that people have; they always bring those into
the club--they always bring those into any organization they work in,
even if they're doing something that's utterly different. I think that
most people like to do something that's a little different than what they
do in a day-to-day job. This is trying to put off the work world and work
on creating a different world and so, if you're an accountant, you may
be so in love with accounting that you want to be the club treasurer,
but I don't think necessarily somebody who is a secretary would want to
be the secretary for a club. The Scribe in our club is a black hanky profession--the
piece of paper goes along with that. Somebody like Franc, who has the
skills of a manager, he also brings with him theatrical skills so that
when they were putting a chorus together, Franc could draw on those skills
from his past and help with that. Franc also does managerial work and
book work and he's an excellent accountant and he's our club Treasurer
and does that very well. We've other people, though, that don't really
have those skills that they use in their day-to-day life, but they've
got some innate skills that they bring with them. We have one person who
an excellent photographer who does not do photography as a living and
that's his contribution to the club.
RAR--I've
heard it said that Leatherpeople like to bring their fantasies to reality.
Do you feel that Leatherpeople are more driven by certain senses, such
as touch, smell, etc?
JP--To
say that people who are into Leathersex are "supersensual" is quoting
Masoch exactly; you're reaching back to nineteenth century thought. It
doesn't really translate well from the German, but I think there's quite
a bit to be said for that. There are people who's chemical, electrical
reactions may be somewhat different. We already know that people react
to different stimuli in different ways. Something that say, for one person
can trigger an allergic reaction, that something somebody finds disagreeable,
somebody finds "just right". It's no strange thing to find out that you
see the same sorts of things in Leather/SM sex, that people who are drawn
to it are somehow linked in some biologic way. I think, to some extent,
all human beings are drawn to the pain/pleasure complex, that's what life
is--it's trying to get a balance between the two. We live in a culture
where pleasure is rammed down our throats to the point that it's painful--life
is trivialized, it has no meaning, it's absurd, it's empty. Pain is something
that helps yank us down again. There was a saying that "the texture of
life needs the valleys as well as the peaks, that it needs the shadows
as well as the light or one cannot find the way."
(during
a break, Jim noted that he wanted to talk a little about the idea of tradition
in the Leather/SM community)
JP--Bill,
Stewart, and I had a conversation one time. Bill was talking about his
background and how Bill is adopted and doesn't even know what his heritage
and background is--Bill doesn't even know what nationality he actually
is. So, for Bill, the big attraction for Leather is that it offers him
some sort of a tradition, a family that he can choose himself and that's
very important to him. So, for Bill, these traditions in Leather that
are five years old or older, are family traditions, something that he's
almost dogmatic about. Stewart, his family is originally from North Carolina
and Stewart kind of said, "Well, that's curious. My background is that
I can go up to the graveyard and there's two hundred years of ancestors
of mine buried there and I feel like I have very deep roots and that's
very comforting to me so that I really don't need to focus on traditions.
I try to find things that are leading me elsewhere; I don't need the anchor."
From my perspective, even things that occurred back in the sixties and
fifties aren't traditions. Because my great grandmother was born in 1842
and didn't die until 1957, I remember hearing first-hand accounts of how
the Czar's troops, we're talking Czar Alexander II, attacked the village
where my grandmother and my relatives had started a rebellion. To me,
nothing's a tradition unless it's hundreds of years old and I think that
sort of comes through on the way the three of us approach the Leather/SM
community--Bill tends to focus on things within the last decade, Stewart
tends to focus on things within the last twenty to thirty years, and I
tend to focus last century.
|